Written by Brad Shu, Partner, DHH Law Firm Shanghai · All articles are informational only — not legal advice
NNN Agreements & OEM Agreements

China NNN Agreements FAQ (2): Whether and When You Need One

Timing and necessity: when an NNN is essential and when another instrument does the job better - samples, purchase orders, manufacturing agreements, idea-stage projects, and suppliers outside China.

TL;DR — the essentials

  • Part 2 of six in the FAQ series accompanying the main guide, China NNN Agreements: The Complete Guide for Foreign Buyers. This part answers questions Q11–Q20 of the series’ 62.
  • Timing and necessity: when an NNN is essential and when another instrument does the job better - samples, purchase orders, manufacturing agreements, idea-stage projects, and suppliers outside China.
  • Start with the main guide for the full picture; use the FAQ series for the specific question you have today.

Part 2 of six in the FAQ series; the numbering continues from part 1. The core text of the topic is the main guide; the other FAQ parts are listed at the bottom of this page.

Questions in this part

Q11. Do I still need a Manufacturing Agreement after the NNN?

Yes. The NNN protects pre-production confidentiality and misuse; the manufacturing agreement governs price, quality, delivery, payment, tooling, subcontracting, and defect remedies. If the factory helps develop the product, a Product Development Agreement allocating IP ownership comes before that work begins.

Q12. Is an NNN suitable in all scenarios?

No. Where the “product” is still an idea and the factory will turn napkin sketches into a viable product, a product design and development agreement — or a commissioned-processing contract — defining IP ownership may fit better than an NNN. An NNN restricts use of what you provide; a development agreement allocates ownership of what gets created.

Q13. When do I NOT need a separate NNN?

(a) Off-the-shelf commodity purchases with nothing valuable disclosed; (b) factory already chosen plus a comprehensive manufacturing agreement signed before disclosure; (c) sometimes the urgent problem is your trademark, which an NNN cannot solve at all — a registration binds the world, an NNN binds only its signatories.

Q14. Do I need different agreements for different Chinese partners?

Yes — each entity that receives your information signs its own, entity-specific agreement (three factories means three agreements; leakage often happens at the quoting stage). Core provisions can be standardised; adding a manufacturer to an established template is cheap and fast. For affiliates of the main factory, either bind them directly or make the factory liable for them (the affiliates question in part 6).

Q15. Is an NNN agreement worth it?

If your IP and confidential information are in play, yes — a fraction of the cost of one mould, one trademark class, or one enforcement action. Two caveats: (a) research your idea first — if many similar products exist or the factory has already made it for someone else, the NNN protects less than you think; (b) don’t buy an NNN when your actual problem is trademark squatting or a bad manufacturing deal — the money is better spent on the right instrument.

Q16. How much time should I spend on NNN agreements?

Less than on supplier selection: shortlist trustworthy factories first, then present the NNN to the selected ones. Heavy haggling over core protections is itself a trust signal.

Q17. What if the manufacturer wants the PO first and won’t sign the NNN before it?

Either include NNN-equivalent clauses in the PO itself, or make the PO expressly conditional on a signed NNN. Ensure the PO or PI contains no language cancelling or superseding the contract terms.

Q18. Do I need an NNN for a supplier in Vietnam, or elsewhere in Asia?

You need enforceable confidentiality, non-use, and IP terms for that country, drafted by someone who practises there. The NNN concept travels; the China template does not — language, governing law, and forum are local questions, and some jurisdictions treat a contract more as a guideline for cooperation than a strict obligation. The same logic applies in reverse: a US NDA is to China what a China NNN is to Vietnam.

Q19. What is required for drafting — what’s the minimum information?

Both parties’ registered names (the Chinese party’s exact registered Chinese name) and addresses; the deal context; and the scope of disclosures. Details of the technology itself are not required in the agreement. Add the verification outputs: USCC, legal representative, chop name.

Q20. What information does an NNN cover?

Everything commercially sensitive the relationship will touch: drawings and CAD files, specifications, prototypes and samples, tooling and mould data, manufacturing processes, pricing and cost data, customer and supplier lists, business plans, and other non-public information disclosed — including information already disclosed before signing (identified in writing) and disclosures to come through informal channels (WeChat, samples, site visits).

The full series

Article Questions
Main guide core text, sections 1–13
FAQ part 1: basics and definitions Q1–Q10
FAQ part 2: whether and when ← you are here Q11–Q20
FAQ part 3: drafting Q21–Q30
FAQ part 4: language, law, execution Q31–Q40
FAQ part 5: money and disputes Q41–Q50
FAQ part 6: scenarios and gaps Q51–Q62

Frequently asked questions

Do I still need a Manufacturing Agreement after the NNN?
Yes. The NNN protects pre-production confidentiality and misuse; the manufacturing agreement governs price, quality, delivery, payment, tooling, subcontracting, and defect remedies. If the factory helps develop the product, a Product Development Agreement allocating IP ownership comes before that work begins.
Is an NNN suitable in all scenarios?
No. Where the "product" is still an idea and the factory will turn napkin sketches into a viable product, a product design and development agreement — or a commissioned-processing contract — defining IP ownership may fit better than an NNN. An NNN restricts use of what you provide; a development agreement allocates ownership of what gets created.
When do I NOT need a separate NNN?
(a) Off-the-shelf commodity purchases with nothing valuable disclosed; (b) factory already chosen plus a comprehensive manufacturing agreement signed before disclosure; (c) sometimes the urgent problem is your trademark, which an NNN cannot solve at all — a registration binds the world, an NNN binds only its signatories.
Do I need different agreements for different Chinese partners?
Yes — each entity that receives your information signs its own, entity-specific agreement (three factories means three agreements; leakage often happens at the quoting stage). Core provisions can be standardised; adding a manufacturer to an established template is cheap and fast. For affiliates of the main factory, either bind them directly or make the factory liable for them (the affiliates question in part 6).
Is an NNN agreement worth it?
If your IP and confidential information are in play, yes — a fraction of the cost of one mould, one trademark class, or one enforcement action. Two caveats: (a) research your idea first — if many similar products exist or the factory has already made it for someone else, the NNN protects less than you think; (b) don't buy an NNN when your actual problem is trademark squatting or a bad manufacturing deal — the money is better spent on the right instrument.
How much time should I spend on NNN agreements?
Less than on supplier selection: shortlist trustworthy factories first, then present the NNN to the selected ones. Heavy haggling over core protections is itself a trust signal.
What if the manufacturer wants the PO first and won't sign the NNN before it?
Either include NNN-equivalent clauses in the PO itself, or make the PO expressly conditional on a signed NNN. Ensure the PO or PI contains no language cancelling or superseding the contract terms.
Do I need an NNN for a supplier in Vietnam, or elsewhere in Asia?
You need enforceable confidentiality, non-use, and IP terms for that country, drafted by someone who practises there. The NNN concept travels; the China template does not — language, governing law, and forum are local questions, and some jurisdictions treat a contract more as a guideline for cooperation than a strict obligation. The same logic applies in reverse: a US NDA is to China what a China NNN is to Vietnam.
What is required for drafting — what's the minimum information?
Both parties' registered names (the Chinese party's exact registered Chinese name) and addresses; the deal context; and the scope of disclosures. Details of the technology itself are not required in the agreement. Add the verification outputs: USCC, legal representative, chop name.
What information does an NNN cover?
Everything commercially sensitive the relationship will touch: drawings and CAD files, specifications, prototypes and samples, tooling and mould data, manufacturing processes, pricing and cost data, customer and supplier lists, business plans, and other non-public information disclosed — including information already disclosed before signing (identified in writing) and disclosures to come through informal channels (WeChat, samples, site visits).

Need help with this? Brad advises clients on exactly this — from WFOE setup to tax structuring and compliance. Tell him about your situation.

Ask Brad

Ask a question about this article

日本語でのご質問も歓迎します。

Your question goes directly to Brad's inbox and is not published — no comment section, no public thread. Please don't include highly confidential details in a first message.

Brad Shu

Partner at DHH Law Firm Shanghai · Formerly Squire Sanders, Morrison Foerster & Jingtian Law Firm · Hangzhou Normal University (B.A. Biology) · Tsinghua University (LL.B.)

Brad Shu is a partner at DHH Law Firm Shanghai and has practiced Chinese law for two decades, including nearly ten years between the Beijing offices of US firms Squire Sanders and Morrison Foerster and leading local firm Jingtian & Gongcheng.